SkyTrain for Surrey, not LRT!

Misinformation Abundant in SkyTrain vs Light Rail Comparisons

We are puzzled by a letter recently published by the Langley Advance. According to the letter-writer, who read (where?) that 8 kilometres of light rail can be built for the same cost as 1 kilometre of SkyTrain, SkyTrain “is not best for the environment – nor the taxpayer, for that matter.”

Clearly, the person who wrote this letter has been misinformed by other light rail advocates—particularly in his referencing of the Evergreen Line.  There are several reasons why TransLink is now planning to build the Evergreen Line as an extension of the SkyTrain system:

  • Firstly, a long section between Burquitlam and Port Moody stations passes through Burnaby Mountain, and would have to be dug by T.B.M. (tunnel boring machine) at very high cost, whether the Evergreen Line were to be constructed as light rail or SkyTrain [24].
  • Second, large portions of the Evergreen Line in Port Moody will be built at-grade along the CPR rail line [24] – only short portions would be elevated, resulting in little cost premium over at-grade LRT.
  • Third, implementing an LRT—which will use a different technology and rolling stock—would require large startup investments. New rolling stock would have to be bought, along with land for a larger maintenance centre for the fleet. Additional cash would have to be spent as new employees at a new maintenance centre would have to be hired, trained and qualified to work with these specific new trains.
  • Lastly, the Evergreen Line as SkyTrain would be an integrated expansion of the existing system. It would operate continuously to VCC-Clark station, optimizing service by taking over the Millennium Line’s service on that segment.

SkyTrain operates with just one employee for every 150,000 annual passengers—a rate that is 3 times less than Portland’s MAX light rail [22]. Because of this operating efficiency, fare revenues pay for operating costs on all three of the present Metro Vancouver SkyTrain lines.

It would be less costly over the long term to simply build the Evergreen Line as a SkyTrain extension.

Misinformation is abundant in comparisons between SkyTrain and LRT costs. Tons of considerations, facts and realities are being hidden from you on purpose by light rail advocates.

Dear Editor,

I read that eight kilometres of light rail can be built for the same cost as one kilometre of the SkyTrain system.

That being the case, and using the Evergreen SkyTrain line as an example, a $1-billion SkyTrain system could possibly be completed for $125 million, if light rail were used – a savings of $875 million.

Financing the Evergreen Line has caused the delay in starting and completing it.

If light rail had been used, might the Evergreen Line have been in use years ago, thereby removing a large number of cars and the resultant exhaust pollution?

The money saved with a light rail system could be used to expand rapid transit throughout the Lower Mainland.

Fast-growing areas such as Langley, Aldergrove and Abbotsford would be able to afford expanded rapid transit systems sooner, and more fossil-fuel polluting cars would be removed from our roads.

SkyTrain, with its enormous cost, is not best for the environment – nor the taxpayer, for that matter.

Dave Fidler, Coquitlam

Reality Check

Reality Check is the online blog run by the founder of SkyTrain for Surrey, a BC-based community organization that has advocated for the expansion of the Vancouer SkyTrain system, including our successful advocacy for the under-construction Surrey-Langley SkyTrain extension.

Media Contact: Daryl Dela Cruz ​– Founder, SkyTrain for Surrey ・ Phone: +1 604 329 3529, [email protected]

Misinformation Abundant in SkyTrain vs Light Rail Comparisons